Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2009

Inertial effects are felt when there is a change in constant straight motion- acceleration, rotation, changing direction etc.
This inertial effect that Newton showed was a direct attack on Descartes position in which he stated that objects are at true rest when they rest relative to their surroundings, but it also attacks the relationist, for the [...]

Read Full Post »

Berkeley and Mach were relationists who attempted to take up and finish Leibniz’s arguments, especially when it came to inertial effects.
Both object to absolute space on the grounds put forward by Leibniz- namely PSR and PII. Absolutist talk is incomprehensible, just like ‘nelectricity’.
Berkeley says we cannot imagine a moving object without its moving relative to [...]

Read Full Post »

‘To suppose two things indiscernible is to suppose the same thing under two names’. If the two universes cannot be told apart, according to PII, they are one and the same. Introducing Absolute space makes them different, this violating the principle.
Clarke says that the PII does not hold, for his ship example shows that there [...]

Read Full Post »

Newton’s claim of the existence of Absolute space was attacked by the relationist Leibniz in a correspondence with the absolutist Clarke. Leibniz appealed to the maxim that nothing happens to be one way without a reason for it being such, and said that through looking at absolute space from this angle, it would be shown [...]

Read Full Post »

THOMAS MORRIS; A MODERN DISCUSSION OF DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE
In Christianity, it is said that ‘with God all things are possible’, but what does this mean?
What is the magnitude of God’s power?

1. God can do everything-Entails god can create spherical cubes. When you have the expression of a logical impossibility, you end up with nothing that can [...]

Read Full Post »